Re: [PATCH 02/14] pull: pass verbosity, --progress flags to fetch and merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Johannes,

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 2015-05-21 11:48, Paul Tan wrote:
>> Unfortunately, the usage of strbuf means that we lose the ability to
>> know if an option was not provided at all (the value is NULL). This is
>> important as some of these options are used to override the default
>> configured behavior.
>
> Would this not be implied by the strbuf's len being 0?

You're right >.< I think I need more coffee as well ;-)

It would mean adding STRBUF_INIT's to all of the option variables, but
I don't think it is a problem. strbufs it is, then.

>>> You might also want to verify that arg is `NULL` when `unset != 0`. Something like this:
>>
>> Hmm, would there be a situation where arg is NULL when `unset != 0`?
>
> I forgot to say that my suggestion was purely meant as defensive coding. Yes, `arg` *should* be `NULL` when `unset != 0`. Should ;-)
>
> By the way, just to make sure: My comments and suggestions are no demands; you should feel very free to reject them when you feel that your code is better without the suggested changes. I am just trying to be helpful.

Thanks, your comments have been really helpful. I really do appreciate it :).

Regards,
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]