When looking through existing tests to point out good style I came across t1020, which has a test commented out and the comment wasn't helping me either of what the test should accomplish in the future. The code of the test is the same as the test before except setting GIT_DIR=. explicitly, so it did not ring a bell for me as well. This removes the test, which may have been confusing readers since 2010. Additionally moves the "rm -fr foo.git" of the next test (where it is unrelated) to the previous test, where it makes sense as a cleanup. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> --- t/t1020-subdirectory.sh | 11 +---------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t1020-subdirectory.sh b/t/t1020-subdirectory.sh index 2edb4f2..4470ede 100755 --- a/t/t1020-subdirectory.sh +++ b/t/t1020-subdirectory.sh @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ test_expect_success 'no file/rev ambiguity check inside .git' ' ' test_expect_success 'no file/rev ambiguity check inside a bare repo' ' + test_when_finished "rm -fr foo.git" && git clone -s --bare .git foo.git && ( cd foo.git && @@ -170,17 +171,7 @@ test_expect_success 'no file/rev ambiguity check inside a bare repo' ' ) ' -# This still does not work as it should... -: test_expect_success 'no file/rev ambiguity check inside a bare repo' ' - git clone -s --bare .git foo.git && - ( - cd foo.git && - git show -s HEAD - ) -' - test_expect_success SYMLINKS 'detection should not be fooled by a symlink' ' - rm -fr foo.git && git clone -s .git another && ln -s another yetanother && ( -- 2.4.0.194.gc518059 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html