On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On do, 2015-05-14 at 12:18 -0500, Robert Dailey wrote: >> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Dennis Kaarsemaker >> <dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On do, 2015-05-14 at 09:57 -0500, Robert Dailey wrote: >> >> Is there a script or built-in functionality in git 2.4.1 that will >> >> allow me to list all local branches with the ahead and behind status >> >> of each? Basically the first line of: >> >> >> >> $ git status -sb >> >> >> >> But for every branch would be roughly what I'm looking for. Any ideas? Thanks. >> > >> > git branch -v (or -vv) is what you're after. >> > -- >> > Dennis Kaarsemaker >> > www.kaarsemaker.net >> > >> >> Nice, I never noticed that -v showed ahead/behind status. Would be >> nice if branch had a --format option to customize the coloring of the >> "ahead" / "behind" text so that there was more contrast. It's a lot of >> information to consume especially with a lot of local branches; >> coloring would bring some sanity. > > Fortunately for you, git for-each-ref lets you do just this. For > example, this gives you what branch -vv does, minus coloration and > padding: > > git for-each-ref --format '%(HEAD) %(refname:short) %(upstream:short) %(upstream:track) %(subject)' refs/heads Great idea. For some reason I can't apply coloring though: for-each-ref --format '%(HEAD) %(refname:short) %C(bold blue)%(upstream:track)%C(reset)' refs/heads Output: hotfix/4.2.3.1 %C(bold blue)[ahead 1, behind 1]%C(reset) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html