On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:13:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> See $gmane/268881 > > > > Well, technically he just said it might be that people are parsing the > > output and could be broken, but if you'd rather not take that risk then > > I guess we just have to leave things the way they are. > > FWIW. > > - I personally do not agree that those who scripted around "git > bisect" (as opposed to those who wrote scripts to be driven by > the "bisect run" interface) are worth worrying about. But I am > not the whole of the Git world ;-) It is not clear to me that people are actually scripting around the output. Between the exit code and the stable output in BISECT_LOG, that seems like a much more preferable way for scripted uses to find out what happened. Of course, that is not a guarantee that nobody scraped stderr, but at least it makes me feel better that they're Doing It Wrong. :) It would be nice if we had some actual data points. I followed the link Christian gave to Ingo's old post, but I didn't see the actual script there. There is: https://github.com/grosser/git-autobisect/blob/master/lib/git/autobisect.rb which does seem to scrape stderr. Bleh. > - I _do_ think diff-tree --raw output without recursive is silly. > It is not useful for humans (it doesn't even give paths fully), > and it is insufficient for scripts, which can grok more through > information out of the 40-hex. > > So perhaps if we keep > > <40 char sha1> is the first bad commit > > and then replace the diff-tree output with "show -s", then the > result would be good enough, I would say. That seems like a reasonable first step, at the very least. I wonder if we should also better document the exit code and BISECT_LOG semantics, and explicitly tell people not to scrape stderr. That at least frees us up later to change the output as we see fit (I notice that most of the messages in the script are already i18n'd; the ones from bisect--helper are the odd ones out). -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html