David Turner <dturner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> We need to also say something about the "missing" vs "loop" case, if >> we choose to leave that part broken. I'd rather see it fixed, but >> that is not a very strong preference. > > Will add an example. I do not think we need an example. By "also say", I meant in addition to "This and that does not currently work", we also need to say that loops do not work well. In other words, it is enough to just mention that it is a current limitation (or a bug, whichever we choose to call) that loops are reported as missing. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html