On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> The following other branches, also from my GitHub repo, might be >> useful: >> >> * 'write-refs-sooner-2.3' -- suggested merge of the change to 'maint'. >> >> * 'write-refs-sooner-master' -- suggested merge of the change to >> 'master'. >> >> * 'write-refs-sooner-rebased-2.3' and >> 'write-refs-sooner-rebased-master' -- rebases of 'write-refs-sooner' >> onto 'maint' and 'master' respectively, in case anybody is >> interested to see how the individual patches would look if >> implemented natively on these branches. > > Thanks, that indeed is very helpful and instructive. > > A mechanical merge of sooner-2.2 to maint trivially gave sooner-2.3, > so I am happy with that one. > > Even though I manually resolved it and the resulting tree pretty > much matched with your suggested merge, I am hesitant to record the > change of sooner-2.3 as a single large merge to master. I am > tempted to record this as somewhat a wicked merge, e.g. > > - apply posted patches on maint-2.2, which is your sooner-2.2; > > - branch sooner-2.3 from maint, merge sooner-2.2; > > - branch sooner-master from v2.4.0, apply the patches in your > sooner-rebased-master on top, and then merge sooner-2.3, possibly > with "-s ours" > > And then sooner-master would record both "if built naturally on 2.4" > progression, which would explain what was done much better than a > huge merge of sooner-2.3 into 'master', and "what is to be done on > older codebase". > > I dunno. > > Anyway, these patches looked good both on 2.2 and on 2.4. Thanks. The patches from Michael all look good. The one he picked up from me has a weird commit message, though. Thanks, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html