On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:26:23PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: > > So something like 100ms max backoff makes sense to me, in that it keeps > > us in the same order of magnitude as the expected time that the lock is > > held. [...] > > I don't understand your argument. If another process blocks us for on > the order of 100 ms, the backoff time (reading from my table) is less > than half of that. I think it is just that I was agreeing with you, but communicated it badly. I think your series is fine as-is. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html