On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 05:29:42PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > its rather silly especially considering the next line contains the > > full hash again. > > Maybe we can omit it altogether then? SO we'd print something like the first bad commit is Commit abcdefabcdefabcdefabcdefabcdefabcdefabcd Author foo@xxxxxx blah blah blah ? That seems reasonable to me. If we're going that far does it also make sense to drop printingthe lines about which trees have changed and just print the commit message / author / hash? Trev -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html