Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Both this patch and 9/12 change `git pull` invocations to equivalent > non-pull ones, but I wonder whether it would not be a better idea to > leave them as-are, so that we can make sure that scripts out there > that might use similar `git pull` invocations would be unaffected by > the rewrite? Yes. I do not mind changing t4013 that is not about testing 'git pull' to lose 'git pull . other-branch', but then we would want to have a corresponding test somewhere in the test script that is about testing 'git pull' to cover that (ancient) pattern of use. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html