Fredrik Medley <fredrik.medley@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > 2015-05-06 0:16 GMT+02:00 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Fredrik Medley <fredrik.medley@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt >>> index 2e5ceaf..76cd713 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/config.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/config.txt >>> @@ -2538,6 +2538,12 @@ uploadpack.allowtipsha1inwant:: >>> of a hidden ref (by default, such a request is rejected). >>> see also `uploadpack.hideRefs`. >>> >>> +uploadpack.allowreachablesha1inwant:: >> >> I know that the existing allowtipsha1inwant is spelled that way, and >> it may be better done as a separate clean-up patch (either before or >> after this step), but the documentation and the first line of the >> log message would be easier to read with >> >> uploadpack.allowReachableSHA1InWant >> >> I'd think. >> > > I would prefer using allowReachableSha1InWant. Please tell > me if I should use SHA1InWant instead of Sha1InWant. > (I cannot find anything similar in the repository.) Keep in mind what was discussed recently: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/265225/focus=265322 I would think SHA1 should be upcased (so should SSL, SMTP, etc.) even in the existing ones when we do the "clean-up" pass. Even though this patch is not about cleaning up existing mess, there is no point adding more cruft that we need to clean up later ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html