"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > We definitely have an issue with localhost. When forcing the DNS resolver to > return 127.0.0.1, we pass 1-16 then 17 fails as I expected to happen based > on my DNS futzing. Heads up that this test is not-surprisingly sensitive to > DNS problems. My environment is still in a messy state where I can reproduce > the original problem so it might be a useful moment for me to find a way to > modify the test script to harden it. Any suggestion on that score > (as in where and roughly how it might be made more reliable)? I do not think this counts as a useful "suggestion", but is this "resolver does not work for local as expected" case even worth protecting our tests against? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html