Re: [PATCH v4] blame: CRLF in the working tree and LF in the repo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-05-01 19.13, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> A typical setup under Windows:
>> core.eol is CRLF and a file is marked as "text" in .gitattributes,
>> or core.autocrlf is true
> 
> A full sentence (a proper prose) is easier to read.  The above is
> unclear if that is what you are unilaterally declaring, a statement
> of fact, or something else (see what I queued based on the previous
> round on 'pu').

OK, let's go for that, thanks for amending.
And is there a chance to correct my mis-spelling ?

s/A typicall/A typical/ 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]