Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-branch: add --track and --no-track options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Yes, that is correct.  Some C lib implementations seem to count
> %n and others don't so it is not reliable.  That is one of the
> reasons I personally have stayed away from fancier sscanf()
> constructs, both inside and outside git project.

So, should I remove it?  As I said, the code using sscanf is already the second try, and the first was utterly illegible, so I'd rather stay with it.

Paolo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]