Re: [PATCH/RFC] blame: CRLF in the working tree and LF in the repo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 28.04.2015 um 21:52 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes:

I set none of these. But I do commit CRLF and expect to get CRLF
back. Am I commiting binary files? Am I doing something that "Git does
not support"? Am I "on [my] own"?

I think these specific sentences are merely uninformed opinions; if
I ignore and re-read what people said in the discussion, I think the
thread as a whole makes sense.

Thanks for the clarification. Following the thread only superficially, I feared some behavior change (or even just a redefinition of what "is supported") is about to surface that impacts established workflows.

-- Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]