On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Do we actually need a large repo here? The real cost is coming from the > directories we create. We could actually start with a totally empty > repository if we wanted (though I don't think the t/perf system handles > that right now). But if there's not a reason to use the large repo, I > think using test_perf_default_repo is better, as it works out of the box > without specifying extra environment variables (well, it works either > way, but you get a nasty warning from perf-lib.sh). > > -Peff Sure, I'll change this to the default. I wasn't sure about the performance characteristics of clean (does working tree size matter?) when I started so it felt safest to go with a large repo. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html