On 04/24/2015 02:27 AM, Pete Harlan wrote: > Junio writes: >> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Document `git status -v`, including its new doubled `-vv` form. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> Will queue on mg/status-v-v series, which did add description for >> "commit -v", but "status -v" did not have the description to begin >> with and we missed it. > [...] >>> +-v:: >>> +--verbose:: >>> + In addition to the names of files that have been changed, also >>> + show the textual changes that are staged to be committed >>> + (i.e., like the output of `git diff`). If `-v` is specified > > Should this be `git diff --cached`? > >>> + twice, then also show the changes in the working tree that >>> + have not yet been staged (i.e., like the output of `git diff >>> + --cached`). > > ...and should this just be `git diff`? Yes, you're right. Thanks for catching this, Pete. The shorter the patch, the higher the error density :-( Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html