Stefan Saasen <ssaasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Anyway, long story short. We're interested to help but I'm not > entirely sure what that would look like at the moment. Are there > formed ideas floating around or would you be looking for some form of > proposal instead? I am not proposing anything or looking for proposals myself, actually. It is just somebody expressed interest in having tested older maintenance track that is kept alive in the past, so I was merely trying to help connect you with that old thread. If those who are interested in having such LTS track(s) need something specific from me, and if it will not be unrealistic maintenance burden, I am willing to help. That's all. For example, LTS group for whatever reason may nominate 2.2.x track as a base that they want to keep alive longer than other maintenance tracks and promise to test changes to them to keep it stable. Then I can help the effort by making sure people's bugfix patches would apply down to 2.2.x track (often people make mistake of using newer facility to fix or test the fix for an ancient bug, and bugfix topic branch ends up forked at a point much newer than where it should be). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html