Re: [PATCH/RFC v3 0/4] Improving performance of git clean

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, thanks for looking into this.

I have no well founded opinions on the implementation but I do
think the performance tests would be more meaningful if the
setup/cleanup code could be removed from the timed section.
If the community agrees on an implementation I would be happy
to convert the new tests, either directly in this series or as a follow
up if that is preferred.

/Erik

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/18, Erik Elfström wrote:
>> * Still have issues in the performance tests, see comments
>>   from Thomas Gummerer on v2
>
> I've looked at the "modern" style tests again, and I don't the code
> churn is worth it just for using them for the performance tests.  If
> anyone wants to take a look at the code, it's at
> github.com/tgummerer/git tg/perf-lib.
>
> I think adding the test_perf_setup_cleanup command would make more
> sense in this case.  If you want I can send a patch for that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]