Re: [PATCH v2] CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Julian Gindi <juliangindi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> CodingGuidelines: updating 'rough' rule count

Imperative mood is preferred, so "update" rather than "updating":

    CodingGuidelines: update 'rough' rule count

>     Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to the more
>     generic 'a few'.

Imperative: s/Changed/Change/

> ---

Missing sign-off.

> diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
> index 0f8cccf..2dd35bd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
> +++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  Like other projects, we also have some guidelines to keep to the
> -code.  For Git in general, three rough rules are:
> +code.  For Git in general, a few rough rules are:

Looks better, thanks.

>   - Most importantly, we never say "It's in POSIX; we'll happily
>     ignore your needs should your system not conform to it."
> --
> 2.3.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]