Re: [PATCH] Use non-interactive function to byte-compile files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2007-03-05 09:23:42 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Ihope this one is more closed to what you expect to see in a
> commit log.
>
> * contrib/emacs/Makefile: add git-blame as a candidate to the
>    	    byte-compilation.  batch-byte-compile is the prefered way
>    	    to byte-compile files in batch mode. Use it instead of the
>    	    interactive function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xavier Maillard <zedek@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  contrib/emacs/Makefile |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/emacs/Makefile b/contrib/emacs/Makefile

Unless you intended the "hi, I hope this is better" part to be part of
the commit message, you should put it after the "---"; otherwise,
Junio will have to fix it up by hand.

Yes, Documentation/SubmittingPatches is a loooong text ...

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]