On 1 April 2015 at 00:03, David Lang <david@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Øyvind A. Holm wrote: > > openhub.net (formerly ohloh.net) has an interesting comparison of > > the number of public repositories on the net, based on searches of > > popular hosting services. This comparison is available at > > <https://www.openhub.net/repositories/compare> and shows an > > estimated market share between Bazaar, CVS, Git, Mercurial and > > Subversion. > > > > I've been monitoring this since 2014-08-05 to see how things were > > developing, and it's a good indication of the popularity of the > > various version control systems. > > number of repositories is an interesting datapoint, but activity in > the repos would be far more interesting. There are a lot of repos of > various types out there that haven't been touched for years. I do agree on that. Many repositories won't be deleted if they are converted to other VC systems to avoid breaking links and so on. What I found pretty interesting is the relative growth between the various systems. That's why I created the graphs that show creation of new repositories since August 2014 instead, for example https://github.com/sunny256/openhub-repositories/blob/master/graph/relative-zoom.svg - Øyvind -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
