Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] protocol v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> So I started looking into extending the buffer size as another 'first step'
> towards the protocol version 2 again. But now I think the packed length
> limit of 64k is actually a good and useful thing to have and should be
> extended/fixed if and only if we run into serious trouble with too small
> packets later.

I tend to agree.  Too large a packet size would mean your latency
would also suck, as pkt-line interface will not give you anything
until you read the entire packet.  The new protocol should be
designed around a reasonably sized packets, using multiple packets
to carry larger payload as necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]