Am 20.03.2015 um 11:13 schrieb Jeff King:
This script misses a trivial &&-chain in one of its tests,
but it also has a weird reverse: it includes an &&-chain
outside of any test_expect block! This "cat" should never
fail, but if it did, we would not notice, as it would cause
us to skip the follow-on test entirely (which does not
appear intentional; there are many later tests which rely on
this cat).
Let's instead move the setup into its own test_expect_success
block, which is the standard practice nowadays.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh b/t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh
index 86dfee2..a93e159 100755
--- a/t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh
+++ b/t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh
@@ -145,9 +145,11 @@ test_expect_success 'forks: not skipped unless "forks" feature enabled' '
grep -q ">fork of .*<" gitweb.body
'
-cat >>gitweb_config.perl <<\EOF &&
-$feature{'forks'}{'default'} = [1];
-EOF
+test_expect_success 'enable forks feature' '
+ cat >>gitweb_config.perl <<-\EOF
+ $feature{'forks'}{'default'} = [1];
+ EOF
+'
This loses the single-quotes in the generated perl script, doesn't it?
Most likely, it does not matter.
-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html