Re: [PATCH 1/5] t5312: test object deletion code paths in a corrupted repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> So I'm inclined to leave it (we do confirm with the rev-parse call at
> the end of the setup that our packed-refs file is working) unless you
> feel strongly. If you do, I'd rather go the route of sticking each
> corruption in its own separate sub-repo.

No, I don't feel strongly either way---otherwise I wouldn't be
wondering if it makes a difference, but explaining why hand-crafting
is a bad idea (or the other way around).

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]