Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Randall S. Becker > <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On March 15, 2015 6:19 PM Christian Couder wrote: >> <snip> >>> Just one suggestion on the name and half a comment. >>> >>> How would "Git Review" (or "Git Monthly Review", or replace your favourite >>> "how-often-per-period-ly" in its name) sound? I meant it to sound similar >> to >>> academic journals that summarize and review contemporary works in the >> field >>> and keeps your original "pun" about our culture around "patch reviews". > > I would be ok for that but there is already this Gerrit related command: > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/git-review > > Maybe I can just use "Git Rev", but it doesn't tell that it is about news? > >> If I may humbly offer the suggestion that "Git Blame" would be a far more >> appropriate pun as a name :) > > You don't want me to steal Junio's blog title: > > http://git-blame.blogspot.fr/ > > don't you? "Git Annotate"? -- David Kastrup -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html