Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik <sveinung84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> A bigger question is why this change is made to gitk completion. If
>> this completion were useful for "gitk", wouoldn't it be equally
>> useful for "git log"?
> I must admit that I didn't know that "git log" could display the
> content of a stashed change. After trying "git log -p -m stash@{0}" I
> would say that adding stashes for "git log" would be slightly less
> useful.
Yeah, it would not be so useful to dig with "log" beyond the commit
that each stash entry is based on. But imagine "git show stash@{....}"
or "git log -g stash@{0}"?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html