Re: Efficient parsing of `status -z` output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think this is how -z was designed to be used, and if that isn't
> clear, then the documentation must be updated to clarify.  Rename
> and Copy are the only ones that needs two pathnames, and I suspect
> that whoever did the original description of the short format in the
> documentation knew Git too well that he forgot to mention it ;-)

I see, thank you. But how would one ever get a copy operation to show
up in the output of `git status -z` to begin with? It appears copies
are only detected in `diff` and `show`, can be forced with the
--find-copies-harder option, but that `git status` does not appear to
take that option nor detect copies in any way that I can get it to
replicate and output that status code to me... a test case would be
great if you know one, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]