Re: [PATCH] t5516-fetch-push: Correct misspelled pushInsteadOf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anders Kaseorg <andersk@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  t/t5516-fetch-push.sh | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t5516-fetch-push.sh b/t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
> index 85c7fec..594d7a6 100755
> --- a/t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
> +++ b/t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ test_expect_success 'push with pushInsteadOf' '
>  test_expect_success 'push with pushInsteadOf and explicit pushurl (pushInsteadOf should not rewrite)' '
>  	mk_empty testrepo &&
>  	test_config "url.trash2/.pushInsteadOf" testrepo/ &&
> -	test_config "url.trash3/.pusnInsteadOf" trash/wrong &&
> +	test_config "url.trash3/.pushInsteadOf" trash/wrong &&
>  	test_config remote.r.url trash/wrong &&
>  	test_config remote.r.pushurl "testrepo/" &&
>  	git push r refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master &&

Interesting.

Now an obvious and natural question after seeing this change is how
the original test passed with misspelled configuration.  Is a test
that pushes into "trash/wrong" checking the right outcome?  If the
reason why the existing tests passed without this patch is because
they do not test the right thing, then shouldn't they be corrected
together with the above fix?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]