Re: [PATCH] Quick description of possible gitattributes system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 2007 March 02 04:46, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Thinking about this a bit more, I take this "syntax" part back.
> One-line-per-record format is much nicer if we want to keep this
> information in .gitattributes files in-tree, especially because

That was my original thought.  However, it occurred to me that we might have 
an implicit handler for .gitattributes that said

[handler "attributesfile"]
  merge = builtin-attributes-merge

So you don't necessarily have to keep it line based (although I suppose that 
is easier than writing a special merger).


Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]