Re: [PATCH] sequencer: preserve commit messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Hmm, wouldn't it introduce a grave regression for users who
>> explicitly ask to clean crufty messages up (by setting their own
>> commit.cleanup configuration) if you unconditionally force
>> "--cleanup=verbatim" here?
>> 
>
> That's what I meant by possible side-effects below.
> ...
> But git cherry-pick without conflict should no re-cleanup the commit
> message either, should it?

Hmm, but if it does not, wouldn't that countermand the wish of the
user who explicitly asked to clean crufty messages up by setting
their own commit.cleanup configuration?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]