Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 22.02.2015 22:41: > [Stalled] > > * nd/list-files (2015-02-09) 21 commits > . t3080: tests for git-list-files > . list-files: -M aka diff-cached > . list-files -F: show submodules with the new indicator '&' > . list-files: add -F/--classify > . list-files: show directories as well as files > . list-files: do not show duplicate cached entries > . list-files: sort output and remove duplicates > . list-files: add -t back > . list-files: add -1 short for --no-column > . list-files: add -R/--recursive short for --max-depth=-1 > . list-files: -u does not imply showing stages > . list-files: make alias 'ls' default to 'list-files' > . list-files: a user friendly version of ls-files and more > . ls-files: support --max-depth > . ls-files: add --column > . ls-files: add --color to highlight file names > . ls-files: buffer full item in strbuf before printing > . ls_colors.c: highlight submodules like directories > . ls_colors.c: add a function to color a file name > . ls_colors.c: parse color.ls.* from config file > . ls_colors.c: add $LS_COLORS parsing code > > A new "git list-files" Porcelain command, "ls-files" with bells and > whistles. > > No comments? No reviews? No interests? I like the result a lot (I admit - I like colors in terminals). Since the aim is a user facing command I'm wondering whether the status symbols really should be those from "ls-files" or rather those from "status -s" (and diff --name-files). (Yes, that would require two chars.) status, status -s and the like are in an ordinary user's tool box. ls-files isn't, at least not with "-t", which we even mark as deprecated. That makes me wonder, though, how difficult it would be to wt_status_collect_unchanged() and to leverage the status machinery rather than ls-files. Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html