Re: Interested in helping open source friends on HP-UX?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 20.02.2015 02:48:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 02:21:11PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> 
>>> It passes NO_ICONV through to the test suite, sets up a prerequisite,
>>> disables some test scripts which are purely about i18n (e.g.,
>>> t3900-i18n-commit), and marks some of the scripts with one-off tests
>>> using the ICONV prereq.
>>
>> Hmm. I know we pass other stuff down, but is this really a good idea? It
>> relies on the fact that the git that we test was built with the options
>> from there. This assumptions breaks (with) GIT_TEST_INSTALLED, if not more.
>>
>> Basically, it may break as soon as we run the tests by other means than
>> "make", which is quite customary if you run single tests.
>>
>> (And we do pass config.mak down, me thinks, but NO_ICONV may come from
>> the command line.)
> 
> It's not quite so bad as you make out. We write the value to the
> GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS file during "make", no matter where it comes from, and
> load that in test-lib.sh. So:
> 
>   make NO_ICONV=Nope
>   cd t
>   ./t3901-i18n-patch.sh
> 
> works just fine (for this and for any of the other options we mark
> there).

It survives a cd, sure... Now, change your config.mak before the cd and
forget the make. Not everyone does

make -C t t3901-i18n-patch.sh

Though, having just discovered that shell completion works for that
form, too, I may do it more often (and then complain about having to use
GIT_TEST_OPTS ;) )

> It won't work for GIT_TEST_INSTALLED, but that is not a new problem.
> Fundamentally you cannot expect to test a version built without option X
> without telling git _somehow_ that it was built that way.
> 
> I suspect GIT_TEST_INSTALLED is not all that widely used, or somebody
> would have complained before. But if we really want to support it, I
> think the right thing is to bake GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS into the binary, so
> that "git --build-options" dumps it. It might also have value for
> debugging and forensics in general.

Yep, that would be helpful in general. I don't think we should worry
about GIT_TEST_INSTALLED too much. Who came up with that feature anyway...?

Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]