Re: Should "git log --decorate" indicate whether the HEAD is detached?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Julien's "HEAD=master, other" vs "HEAD, master, other" may be
> subdued enough to be undistracting, I would guess.  I do not think
> the distinction between "HEAD = master" and "HEAD -> master" would
> be useful, on the other hand.

Just to clarify, I suggested these two notations as alternatives for
denoting the same state: "HEAD is attached to master". They were not
meant to denote different states. Accordingly, a detached HEAD could
be denoted by "HEAD, master, other" (i.e. the same as the current
output of "git log --decorate").
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]