> On Jan 20, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > "Dan Langille (dalangil)" <dalangil@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I did not test this patch. Is that holding up a commit? > > I am hoping that you rebuilt the Git you use with this patch by the > time you wrote the message I am responding to and have been using it > for your daily Git needs ;-) > > I believe it is queued on the 'next' branch so that others like you > who need the change can verify the improvements, and others unlike > you who do not need the change can make sure the change does not > cause unintended consequences. Is this the patch in question? https://github.com/git/git/commit/4dbe66464b4fd695c5989cc272fa0edd6475037c I ask because previous versions of the patch acted against http.h as well and my failure with it. Could I expect that patch work against 2.3.0? It applies cleanly, compiles, but cores when I try a ‘git clone’. Unmatched 2.3.0 succeeds.��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�