Re: Updated version, was Re: RFC: Patch editing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> My plans are _not_ to turn this into git-rebase--interactive.sh, as I 
> originally planned. Instead, I will try to make git-rebase a builtin, and 
> add a "-i" flag which does the equivalent of this script.
>
> BTW would people be mad at me if I did _not_ imitate git-rebase.sh (call 
> format-patch and feed that into apply), but rather used cherry-pick 
> throughout?

Then that C built-in would not replace git-rebase but only
"git-rebase -m".

I very often find it easier to deal with a conflicting rebase by
editing the patch text, so yes I would imagine I would be rather
upset, but I do not know about others.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]