Re: [PATCH 2/3] cmd_push: pass "flags" pointer to config callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> This will let us manipulate any transport flags which have matching
> config options (there are none yet, but we will add one in
> the next patch).

Nice---this will later lets us do push.atomic if we really wanted
to, right?

> To be honest, the whole do_push is confusing to me. It seems like that
> should just be part of cmd_push.

Yeah, that part of the push callchain always confuses me every time
I look at it.  I think it was a consequence of how transport layer
was wedged into the existing codepath that only handled push that
called send-pack to unify the codepaths that push calls into
different transport backends, and we may have done it differently
and more cleanly if we were designing the push to transport to
backends from scratch.

>  builtin/push.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/push.c b/builtin/push.c
> index f558c2e..c25108f 100644
> --- a/builtin/push.c
> +++ b/builtin/push.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ int cmd_push(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	};
>  
>  	packet_trace_identity("push");
> -	git_config(git_push_config, NULL);
> +	git_config(git_push_config, &flags);
>  	argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options, push_usage, 0);
>  
>  	if (deleterefs && (tags || (flags & (TRANSPORT_PUSH_ALL | TRANSPORT_PUSH_MIRROR))))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]