Re: [PATCH 0/2] Getopt::Long workaround in send-email

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:19:27PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
The first one is a replay of Kyle's workaround for older versions of
Getopt::Long that did not take "--no-option" to negate a boolean
option "--option".  The second one revert the workarounds made to
the test script over time, and should break if the first one does
not work well for older Getopt::Long (I have no reason to suspect it
would break, though).

I am inclined to squash these into one commit before starting to
merge them down to 'next' and then to 'master', after getting
Tested-by: from those with older Getopt::Long (prior to 2.32).

Obviously, tc/t9001-noxmailer topic will become unnecessary and be
dropped when that happens.

I think this is a good fix. It preserves the documented behavior even on less capable systems.
--
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]