Re: [PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/12/2015 06:51 PM, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 13.02.2015 um 11:57 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

These patches are on top of what's in 'pu'. They add
--ignore-other-worktrees and make a note about current submodule
support status. I don't think submodule support is ready yet even
with Max Kirillov's series [1]. His 03/03 is already fixed in 'pu'
though, so only 01/03 and 02/03 are new.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261107

With the understanding (perhaps a strongly-worded paragraph in the
release notes) that this is not suitable for submodule users yet,
is this in a good enough shape to go to 'next'?

No objections from my side (and maybe we should also add a warning
that *all* worktree-related configuration - e.g. EOL options - are
currently always shared between all worktrees).

Adding submodule support can then be done in another series (and
renaming core.worktree to something else is definitely *not* the
way to do that! ;-).

I concur the patch series is good enough for next. Better multiple worktree support for submodules is, I think, a sizeable topic that will take a while to settle, so should be worked after this base is integrated.

Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]