Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > +static int merge_recursive(const char *base_sha1, > > > + const char *head_sha1, const char *head_name, > > > + const char *next_sha1, const char *next_name) > > > +{ > > > + ... > > > +} > > > > Somehow I would have expected you to call merge-recursive not spawn, but > > this is saner ;-). > > I briefly considered this, until I realized that merge-recursive is no > builtin yet! Heh, I expected the same thing as Junio when I first read through the patch. But then I realized that doing so right now might not be a great idea; normally if merge-recursive aborts we say "fix up and commit" and do a few things still in cherry-pick/revert before giving the shell back to the user. But a quick pass through merge-recursive.c says this may actually be possible... > Speaking of this issue: Would it be conceivable to make the standalones > into builtins? (This adds a dependency on libcurl to core Git programs, > but I could live with that... It would make a builtin fetch easier, too.) Please don't make libcurl required. I don't build with it on Solaris, because its not there, and I don't need it there. -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html