Re: [PATCH] index-pack: reduce memory footprint a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> matthew sporleder <msporleder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> I'm having trouble getting this new patch to apply.
>
> Apply the first one, replace all object_entry_extra with
> object_stat, replace all objects_extra with obj_stat and amend the
> first one.  Then apply this one.

I got this to work and had a good experience but got this from an arm user:

Cloning into 'NetBSD-src-git'...
remote: Counting objects: 3484984, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (636083/636083), done.
error: index-pack died of signal 10
fatal: index-pack failed
      125.84 real         0.13 user         0.49 sys

Core was generated by `git'.
Program terminated with signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
#0  0x00045f88 in cmd_index_pack ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00045f88 in cmd_index_pack ()
#1  0x00014058 in handle_builtin ()
#2  0x00129358 in main ()


I will wait for the "official" patch and ask if my friend can compile with -g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]