Re: Is there some way to suppress Cc email only to stable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> > Hence the desire to have a Cc that doesn't actually send any email,
>> > but that is visible in mainline for the benefit of the scripts that
>> > handle the stable workflow.
>> 
>> So a configuration variable that you can set once and forget, e.g.
>> 
>>     [sendemail]
>> 	blacklistedRecipients = stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> would not cut it, as you would _later_ want to send the e-mail once
>> the commit hits the mainline.  Am I reading you correctly?
>
> This would actually work for me.  Once the patch is accepted into
> mainline, I am done with it.  So I should -never- send email to
> stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, unless I am doing so manually, for example because
> I forgot to add the stable tag to a given commit.  But in that case,
> I would just use mutt to forward the patch to stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> and git would not be involved.

OK, thanks, we have a workable design to let us move forward, then.

Gits, any takers?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]