Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Right, I do not think these tests will _fail_ when the filesystem does > not support symlinks. But nor are they actually testing anything > interesting. They would pass on such a system even without your patch, > as we would fail to apply even the symlink creation part of the patch. I thought we write out the contents of the symbolic link as a regular file on such a filesystem, and as long as we do not expect "test -h expected-to-be-symlink-we-just-created" to succeed we would be fine. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html