Re: RFD: should we do another 2.3-rc for t9001-noxmailer? I'd say not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I thought at first that we also had a regression in pruning with
> alternates, but it looks like that bug actually went into v2.2.  I still
> think we would want the fix fairly promptly, but it does not need to
> happen before v2.3 is released.

Yes, this was regression in v2.2 we did not catch X-<.  The fix
looks so obvious that it appears nothing should break, but that
tends to be the famous last words, so...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]