Re: RFD: should we do another 2.3-rc for t9001-noxmailer? I'd say not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/02/15 23:48, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I was reviewing the recent bugs and fixes for the last time, and was
wondering if we want to do 2.3-rc3 with build fix for those with
ancient cURL (tc/curl-vernum-output-broken-in-7.11) and workaround
for those with Perl with older Getopt::Long (tc/t9001-noxmailer).

  - The former is not a regression between 2.2 and 2.3 (i.e. 2.2
    already had the same use of curl-config output).

  - The latter, strictly speaking, is a regression in that tests used
    to pass but tests in 2.3 no longer pass for those with older
    Getopt::Long.

So currently I am leaning to keep these two fixes where they are and
tag 2.3 final without them in a few days.


Leaving them for a later release is fine by me.
These two patches cover only what broke from 2.2.2 to 2.3, there are further patches needed to actually complete a build atleast on RHEL3.

-tgc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]