Re: [PATCH 2/2] test-lib.sh: Dynamic test for the prerequisite SANITY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> writes:

>> OK, but MacOS X does not have SANITY problem; "is the / writable?" test
>> was misdetecting and declaring a system with SANITY does not have one.
>>
>> Perhaps roll Cygwin and Mingw into a single Windows category? I dunno.
> The whole discussion actually started with Mac OS X,
> and the conclusion was that Mac OS X should have SANITY set, but hadn't,
> because  / is writable (if you install from scratch):

Exactly.  

On MacOSX running as non-root-but-can-write-to-slash-user, we should
say SANITY is satisfied, but "is the / writable?" check was
misdetecting and declaring the system does not have SANITY.

So we are in agreement, no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]