Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] apply.c: typofix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> -        * it might with whitespace fuzz. We haven't been asked to
>>> +        * it might with whitespace fuzz. We weren't asked to
>>
>> (not a native speaker):
>> A quick websearch reveals "We haven't been asked to ..."
>> is quite commonly used in the web. So it's more of a grammar fix or a
>> rewording of a comment instead of a typofix(which I assume are miss
>> spellings)
>
> Correct; it is not grammo or typo fix, but is a rephrasing to match
> the tense with what follows (i.e. we weren't asked to ignore; we
> were asked to fix).
>

Ok, I realized I missed my conclusion in the first mail: The commit message
and what the patch actually does, do not match.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]