Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] Fix bug in large transactions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> v2 applies to sb/atomic-push instead of next and will result in a one
> line merge conflict with next.

I acctually tried to apply on 'next' and also on 'sb/atomic-push'
and both failed.  I had to wiggle the patches to make them apply on
the latter, and that is what is queued on 'pu' now, but I would not
be surprised if I made silly mistakes while doing so, so please
double check the result and catch them if I did.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]