Re: [PATCH v2 05/18] fsck: Allow demoting errors to warnings via receive.fsck.warn = <key>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On 2015-01-21 09:54, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
>>
>> +	if (starts_with(var, "receive.fsck.")) {
>> +		if (fsck_severity.len)
>> +			strbuf_addch(&fsck_severity, ',');
>> +		strbuf_addf(&fsck_severity, "%s=%s", var + 13, value);
> 
> Wouldn't it be safer to use skip_prefix() that lets you avoid the
> hardcoded "var + 13" here?

Yep, and much more elegant, too. I also fixed three more instances of the same pattern.
 
>> @@ -1470,8 +1478,13 @@ static const char *unpack(int err_fd, struct shallow_info *si)
>>  		argv_array_pushl(&child.args, "unpack-objects", hdr_arg, NULL);
>>  		if (quiet)
>>  			argv_array_push(&child.args, "-q");
>> -		if (fsck_objects)
>> -			argv_array_push(&child.args, "--strict");
>> +		if (fsck_objects) {
>> +			if (fsck_severity.len)
>> +				argv_array_pushf(&child.args, "--strict=%s",
>> +					fsck_severity.buf);
>> +			else
>> +				argv_array_push(&child.args, "--strict");
>> +		}
>>  		child.no_stdout = 1;
>>  		child.err = err_fd;
>>  		child.git_cmd = 1;
>> @@ -1488,8 +1501,13 @@ static const char *unpack(int err_fd, struct shallow_info *si)
>>
>>  		argv_array_pushl(&child.args, "index-pack",
>>  				 "--stdin", hdr_arg, keep_arg, NULL);
>> -		if (fsck_objects)
>> -			argv_array_push(&child.args, "--strict");
>> +		if (fsck_objects) {
>> +			if (fsck_severity.len)
>> +				argv_array_pushf(&child.args, "--strict=%s",
>> +					fsck_severity.buf);
>> +			else
>> +				argv_array_push(&child.args, "--strict");
>> +		}
> 
> Hmm.  The above two hunks look suspiciously similar.  Would it be
> worth to give them a single helper function?

Hmm. Not sure. I see what you mean, but for now I found

+                       argv_array_pushf(&child.args, "--strict%s%s",
+                               fsck_severity.len ? "=" : "",
+                               fsck_severity.buf);

to be more elegant than to add a fully-fledged new function. But if you feel strongly, I will gladly implement a separate function; I would appreciate suggestions as to the function name...

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]