Re: RFC: update hook for GPG signed submission on secured branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:47:25PM -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > I am not sure if the design of this, to require signature only on
> > the tip commit, is sound.  That is not a -bug- in the script,
> > though.
> 
> It is to handle the "all my devs worked on this, they do ________
> GPG", so as long as the tip os signed, it is an implicit I am
> responsible for what is submitted.

Isn't this an ideal scenario for using the signed pushes introduced in
Git 2.2.0?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]