Re: git-svn metadata commands performance issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> How big is the parent process which forks the git commands?  On Linux at
> least, fork() performance is negatively impacted by parent process
> memory size.

Huh.  I thought with the advent of demand-paging, at the very least with
copy-on-write, this was supposed to be sort of a non-issue.

The old original UNIX version, in contrast, consisted of swapping out
the current process without removing the in-memory copy.  But since the
in-memory copy then did the exec call and since usually the exec call
was happy about every page of free memory (we _are_ talking about
something like 64kB of total available memory here), that tended to work
reasonably well.

-- 
David Kastrup
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]